Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

SUO: Results of the vote



Jim is right that the polls are closed and late votes may not be counted.  

It is an unusual circumstance when immediately after the vote members wish to change their votes. Robert's Rules do provide for just such an event.  The procedure is to move for a reconsideration of the vote.  It is a motion that takes precedence over all other motions.  The rationale given is (RONR page 304, lines 18 -28)
Reconsider - a motion of American origin - enables a majority in an assembly, within a limited time and without notice, to bring back for further consideration a motion which has already been voted on. The purpose of reconsidering a vote is to permit correction of hasty, ill-advised, or erroneous action, or to take into account added information or a changed situation that has developed since the taking of the vote.

This certainly seems to be our situation.

The rules regarding this motion are complex, but as it applies to this situation there are two considerations

(1) Timing
(2) Who may make the motion.

The answer  to these questions depends on whether the SUO is considered an assembly or a standing committee.  The rules on reconsideration are different for each as are some other RRO rules and the New York law on not-for-profit organizations (e.g. IEEE).

If the SUO is an assembly (of members) then the motion for reconsideration must be made within two business days of the announcement of the final results of the vote (in this case Monday) and must be made by a member who voted yes.

If the SUO is a standing committee (of the IEEE-SA or some other subordinate organization of IEEE) then any voting member may move the motion (even if they did not vote in the previous ballot) and there is no time limit.

I believe the SUO is a standing committee (a standards committee) that may be created or dissolved by a higher authority (i.e. the IEEE-SA).  We do not have a constitution or by-laws of our own or a legal identify separate from IEEE.

On this assumption (and in a separate note) I will move for reconsideration of the SUMO vote.  Additionally I will put a parliamentary question to the chair for a ruling on whether SUO is an assembly or a standing committee since it has implications beyond this motion.

However, a much simpler solution is for someone who voted yes on the SUO motion to move for reconsideration of the vote.  Moving for reconsideration does not mean the member making the motion is changing their vote.  They may vote yes (or no) in the new vote.  It means that the vote will be taken again.

It is an act of courtesy and consideration that will be appreciated by many.  However one should make it as soon as possible - preferably today.

Bob