SUO: Ballot Comment
>2. This message is to ballot the question, as proposed by Robert Kent:
>"Should the IEEE P1600.1 Standard Upper Ontology Working Group commence
>on the IFF Foundation Ontology version 1.0 [July 20, 2001] posted at
>http://suo.ieee.org/Kent-IFF.pdf, with the intent of developing it into the
>final SUO document?
Comment. The document is inappropriate as a foundation because it
does not provide any clear methodology for determining which of the
many available options to choose during the construction of an upper
ontology. Also, in my (personal) view, it is much too mathematically
oriented to be suitable as a useable upper ontological framework.