SUO: Re: 'q'
¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤
| But does it not seem more proper to call this the feeling's 'quality'
| than its content? Does not the word "content" suggest that the feeling
| has already dirempted itself as an act from its content as an object?
| And would it be quite safe to assume so promptly that the quality 'q' of
| a feeling is one and the same thing with a feeling of the quality 'q'?
|
| William James, 'The Meaning of Truth',
| Longmans, Green, & Co., London, 1909,
| page 5.
¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤