Re: SUO: Site Of Interest (SOI)
Jon --
I happen to agree with you, of course. But I've been informed in no
uncertain terms, several times in previous weeks, that ontology has
absolutely nothing to do with library (bibliographic) classification.
Doug McDavid
Certified Executive Consultant
Voice of the Practitioner Initiatives
Professional Development - BIS, Americas
Member of IBM Academy of Technology
mcdavid@us.ibm.com -- 916-549-4600
Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>@ieee.org on 03/17/2001 07:33:59 PM
Please respond to Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
Sent by: owner-standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org
To: Stand Up Ontology <standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org>
cc:
Subject: SUO: Site Of Interest (SOI)
¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤
Here's one that looks like it's up our alley:
http://www.ams.org/mathweb/Classif/RZhClassification.html
| This classification was prepared as a piece of
| the UDC (Universal Decimal Classification) which
| covers all knowledge in a fairly uniform way.
Jon Awbrey
¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤