ONT Sequential Interactions Generating Hypotheses (SIGH's)
¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤
Okay, Dieter, John, Matthew, Robert,
and maybe one or two other "gamers",
you asked for it, so let's get serial!
I am going to have to pick this thread up
out of the air, as I have completely lost
track of where it began and my mailbox is
utterly enshambled in a tangled web of my
own ineffabled cluelessmess.
It had something to do with Peirce, the Magister Ludi
if ever there were one, and then yet another Ludovico,
like we need Another Nero, broke in with the Whetstone
of Witte to call the LanGauge Game on a Count of Reign.
Well, to begin with, I try to avoid calling them "games",
not because it makes them seamless serious -- not a bit,
do you think that I have not learned better than that!? --
but because it prejudges the matter of their <choose one>
descriptive, normative, speculative character, whereas --
that is not atoll to say that I have a clue "wherefore" --
I find them to begin in that empyrically perilous way
that makes me wonder whether anybody knows the rules,
atoll. That is not to say that anyone is an island.
Which is to say, at the beginning-in-the-middle
of "yet another inquiry" (YAI), which requires
us to guess what the heck is going on and what
the heck is not going to go on. And so on.
So next time I will entertain you with
a piece of raw reality, or as close as
the likes of me is likely ever to get --
now don't get e-cited, not too much,
cause it's no more raw than what we
call a "raw data set", that's all.
Betcha Cant Wait,
Jon Awbrey
¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤