Re: Four further issues
Couple of quick corrections/clarifications:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 10:25:46AM -0400, Josiah Lee Auspitz wrote:
> > Chris Menzel writes:
> > "Obviously, a process ontology in which time is explicitly discrete
> > would not be interoperable with one in which it was continuous." [He goes
> > on to assert that PSL is not such a system.]
> That is, one which assumes neither discreteness nor continuity vis-a-vis
That is, *PSL* is one which assumes neither ...
> ...And even
> information the does involve continuity or discreteness might well be
> shareable with appropriate state setting.
state --> stage