Date Index (Page 86 of 274)
- Re: SUO: Consensus?
- From: Paul Brinkley <brinkley@ontologyworks.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 20:24:01 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Consensus?
- From: sowa <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 20:16:40 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: motions
- From: <richardm@tinwisle.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 19:29:51 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: "Robert E. Kent" <rekent@ontologos.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 19:09:58 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 12:40:43 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Good for SUMO, Good for OpenCyc, good for all of us?
- From: "Jay Halcomb" <jhalcomb8@attbi.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:35:59 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Good for SUMO, Good for OpenCyc, good for all of us?
- From: Patrick Cassidy <pcassidy@bellatlantic.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:12:59 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Certification. Was "Motion for a joint SUO project (extended)"
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 00:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 00:17:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 22:28:41 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 20:23:34 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 16:28:28 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 09:36:23 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Motion for a joint SUO project
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 10:37:15 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Please restate motions
- From: jim.s3@juno.com
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 09:02:52 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Documentation and Implementation
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 08:26:19 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: [semanticweb] Anarchy is the present state of the Knowledge Industry -- ...
- From: Jean-Luc Delatre <jld@club-internet.fr>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 02:01:56 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Re: IFF example?
- From: "Robert E. Kent" <rekent@ontologos.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 18:18:55 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: IFF Example?
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 14:15:45 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 11:51:12 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Why is Category Theory Good for SUO?
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 09:13:04 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: RE: Re: IFF example?
- From: "West, Matthew R SITI-ITPSIE" <matthew.west@shell.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 04:52:23 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: "West, Matthew R SITI-ITPSIE" <matthew.west@shell.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 04:25:49 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Motion for a Joint SUO Project (Follow-Up)(Repost)
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 12:32:22 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: List problems solved, hopefully
- From: jim.s3@juno.com
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 12:05:37 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 09:07:31 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Motion for a Joint SUO Project (Follow-Up)(Repost)
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 07:45:54 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: "West, Matthew R SITI-ITPSIE" <matthew.west@shell.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 04:06:45 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Motion for a Joint SUO Project (Follow-Up)
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 15:42:43 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 14:15:40 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Ontology Development Language Choice
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 13:59:10 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Re: Industry takeover
- From: "Robert E. Kent" <rekent@ontologos.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 13:36:39 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Motion for a Joint SUO Project (Follow-Up)
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 11:42:42 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: IFF example?
- From: "Robert E. Kent" <rekent@ontologos.org>
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 12:53:18 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Ontology Development Language Choice
- From: BHuff@sncorp.com
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 11:21:24 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Category Theory Unplugged
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 08:47:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Internal Consistency proof?
- From: Randall R Schulz <rschulz@sonic.net>
- Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 13:03:45 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: [Fwd: CFP about "Cognitive Modeling in Linguistics"]
- From: Jean-Luc Delatre <jld@club-internet.fr>
- Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 01:25:27 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Motion for a joint SUO project (extended)
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 19:54:46 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: SUO: Re: Industry takeover
- From: "West, Matthew R SITI-ITPSIE" <matthew.west@shell.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 17:52:02 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Motion for a joint SUO project (extended)
- From: Patrick Cassidy <pcassidy@bellatlantic.net>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 16:40:36 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Re: Industry takeover
- From: "Robert E. Kent" <rekent@ontologos.org>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 13:35:30 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Re: Industry takeover
- From: "Robert E. Kent" <rekent@ontologos.org>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 13:22:22 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Practical Consistency Verification
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 12:30:45 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: SUO: Motion for a joint SUO project (extended)
- From: "West, Matthew R SITI-ITPSIE" <matthew.west@shell.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 11:22:10 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: IFF example?
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 10:52:46 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Motion for a joint SUO project
- From: jim.s3@juno.com
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 09:48:12 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Volunteer for IFF Tech Ed
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 09:13:20 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Practical Consistency Through Persistent Modeling
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 09:01:57 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: IFF example?
- From: Chris Menzel <cmenzel@tamu.edu>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 08:59:55 -0400 (EDT)
Return to top of Page
Return to IEEE Standard Upper Ontology (SUO) area
Mail converted by MHonArc
![[Search]](http://grouper.ieee.org/img/search.gif)
![[Standards Home Page]](http://grouper.ieee.org/img/home.gif)
![[Corporate Home Page]](http://grouper.ieee.org/img/corp.gif)