Date Index (Page 85 of 274)
- Re: The Basic Tension (was: Re: SUO: Re: Consensus?)
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 20:29:46 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Building the Hierarchy
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 19:36:45 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Building the Hierarchy
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 18:32:51 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Building the hierarchy
- From: "Robert E. Kent" <rekent@ontologos.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 18:14:07 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Building the hierarchy
- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 17:48:13 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Consensus?
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 17:30:48 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: SUO: Building the hierarchy
- From: "Eric Peterson" <epeterson@CCAAVA.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 17:04:41 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Building the Hierarchy
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 16:50:48 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Building the hierarchy
- From: Patrick Cassidy <pcassidy@bellatlantic.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 16:05:43 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Re: Consensus?
- From: sowa <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 14:51:43 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Building the hierarchy
- From: sowa <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 14:45:32 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Consensus?
- From: "Robert E. Kent" <rekent@ontologos.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 13:19:26 -0400 (EDT)
- The Basic Tension (was: Re: SUO: Re: Consensus?)
- From: "Robert E. Kent" <rekent@ontologos.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 12:50:00 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Consensus?
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 11:38:51 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Re: Consensus?
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 00:39:03 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Consensus?
- From: "Robert E. Kent" <rekent@ontologos.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 19:51:59 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Introduction to Marco Schorlemmer
- From: "Robert E. Kent" <rekent@ontologos.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 16:00:51 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: IFF Technical Editor
- From: jim.s3@juno.com
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 14:00:56 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Copy of original IFF that passed in 2001
- From: jim.s3@juno.com
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:51:51 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: RE: thank you
- From: "West, Matthew R SITI-ITPSIE" <matthew.west@shell.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 06:58:12 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: thank you
- From: "Robert E. Kent" <rekent@ontologos.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 02:08:29 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Please restate motions
- From: jim.s3@juno.com
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 00:17:02 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Consensus?
- From: sowa <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 14:04:44 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: RE: Please restate motions
- From: <richardm@tinwisle.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 11:06:32 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: RE: Consensus?
- From: "Eric Peterson" <epeterson@CCAAVA.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 09:37:22 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: SUMO vote
- From: "Jay Halcomb" <jhalcomb8@attbi.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 00:12:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Consensus?
- From: Cathy Legg <clegg@cyc.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 21:36:42 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Consensus?
- From: sowa <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 21:19:46 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: SUMO vote
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 20:34:41 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Consensus?
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 20:31:30 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Consensus?
- From: Paul Brinkley <brinkley@ontologyworks.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 20:24:01 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Consensus?
- From: sowa <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 20:16:40 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: motions
- From: <richardm@tinwisle.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 19:29:51 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: "Robert E. Kent" <rekent@ontologos.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 19:09:58 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 12:40:43 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Good for SUMO, Good for OpenCyc, good for all of us?
- From: "Jay Halcomb" <jhalcomb8@attbi.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:35:59 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Good for SUMO, Good for OpenCyc, good for all of us?
- From: Patrick Cassidy <pcassidy@bellatlantic.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:12:59 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Certification. Was "Motion for a joint SUO project (extended)"
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 00:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 00:17:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 22:28:41 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 20:23:34 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 16:28:28 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 09:36:23 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Motion for a joint SUO project
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 10:37:15 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Please restate motions
- From: jim.s3@juno.com
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 09:02:52 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Documentation and Implementation
- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 08:26:19 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: [semanticweb] Anarchy is the present state of the Knowledge Industry -- ...
- From: Jean-Luc Delatre <jld@club-internet.fr>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 02:01:56 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: Re: IFF example?
- From: "Robert E. Kent" <rekent@ontologos.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 18:18:55 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: IFF Example?
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 14:15:45 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: SUO: Why is IFF and the Lattice of Theories good for SUMO
- From: Adam Pease <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 11:51:12 -0400 (EDT)
Return to top of Page
Return to IEEE Standard Upper Ontology (SUO) area
Mail converted by MHonArc